|
Tim,
I was discussing this subject recently with a very respected member of this group. We were both confused how turning over a crucial, and I do mean crucial to the longevity of the system, piece of creating a modern UI is turned over to third party vendors instead of being fully integrated and included in the OS.
Some vendors have done an admirable job creating a product, but IMHO, it's ridiculous to have to pay a large bundle extra to get what should be included and easily integrated into the system. It is also more expensive to develop using (at least) some of these tools. My estimate is at least 25% longer to develop and test.
I have three clients that are jumping ship to a PC based platform, another that has already gone in that direction (they used to have the largest AS/400 config in the US northeast (which included 14 AS/400's) and another is in the midst of moving part of their operation to a PC based cloud system. I haven't heard of a new member to the midrange fold in a long time. I would imagine that they exist, but I think that 20+ years after the GUI became popular, for IBM not to include this required functionality, plus the GUI development tools as part of the base OS, is just plain foolish.
No offense to the tool vendors, but I believe that this functionality is best integrated at a low level in the OS, not as a generic API in order to get the best integration, debugging and performance.
-mark
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.