×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
On 28/05/2009, at 4:34 AM, James H. H. Lampert wrote:
But if I make parameters required in the source, the compiler thows a
CPD0213 ("Value of MAXPOS parameter less than number of required
parameters.") exception.
Required parameters are ALWAYS positional. Optional parameters MAY be
positional.
Is there a way to get around that, other than moving the required
parameter check into the program (and losing the usual consequences of
omitting a required parameter)?
No**. Design your command to work within the Command Analyser structure.
** You could use a Validity Check Program (VCP)to perform this check
rather than do it in the Command Processing Program (CPP) but you
still won't get the same behaviour as an omitted required parameter
would show.
Regards,
Simon Coulter.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
FlyByNight Software OS/400, i5/OS Technical Specialists
http://www.flybynight.com.au/
Phone: +61 2 6657 8251 Mobile: +61 0411 091 400 /"\
Fax: +61 2 6657 8251 \ /
X
ASCII Ribbon campaign against HTML E-Mail / \
--------------------------------------------------------------------
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
