We are not debating the name, but the marketing for someone who has i5/OS

I agree, you must market to your constituents who think they have an AS/400.
Why? Because you are not willing to educate them that there is something
that has evolved from the AS/400. You want to let them think that they are
living in the past. While this is not ~my~ preference, that does not mean it
is not valid. My point was simply this - the number of people who HAVE
AS/400s is shrinking. The number of people who THINK they have AS/400s is
shrinking. If you cater for AS/400s, your market will shrink. Not a good
business decision. In the end, marketing software to a customer with an
AS/400 is certainly different than marketing to those customers who have an
iSeries, and is different than marketing to customers who think of their
server as a System i. It is up to you which of these markets you chase - if
you blindly stick to AS/400, you will miss out on the future customers. (And
no, I am not advocating three campaigns, either!)

And, I think there is a difference between marketing, and SELLING to a
prospect. If your prospect is looking actively at the market, they will find
you with your i5/OS moniker. Because you have done all the right things and
included enough about the AS/400 to show your strong heritage. Then, when
you talk to them and SELL to them, you can keep being stubborn and call
their System i server an AS/400 - makes you happy, makes them happy, and
does nothing to promote the future of the platform. I think you should take
that opportunity to MARKET the future of the platform while you SELL your

I don't think we disagree about the use of the term "AS/400" - just the
prominence of it. And, I like to think it is a talking point to get them to
understand that AS/400 is our PAST, and i5/OS is our future. Not too
difficult, IMO, but something that few people can get used to - or want to
even try?

AS/400 is our heritage. i5/OS is our future.

On 10/4/07 3:40 PM, "John Earl" <john.earl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Do you need to communicate to someone who is not listening or keeping
Marketing is for awareness, not education...

I was determined not to participate in another name debate, but Trevor
(and I say this in the nicest way possible because I like you), on this
point you couldn't be more wrong.

Yes, IBM screwed this name thing up royally - and the group that is most
adversely affected is ISV's - we now have to change all of our marketing
collateral to reflect all of the existing names, and no, no effing way,
can we afford to drop the "AS/400" moniker because there are lots of
people who have a need for ISV software for there System i's, yet still
refer to their System's as "AS/400's". No ISV I know of is willing (or
able) to ignore a prospect because the prospect doesn't know the current
"correct" name for the freaking box.

We (ISV's) _need_ to talk to people who still think of the box as
"AS/400" because they need our (ISV's collectively) software. If we
ignore this demographic, we could miss a huge chunk of our potential

My advice to the original poster is to prominently use the name AS/400
on your website. There will be lots of people who will google on that
name, and you want them to find you.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2019 by and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].