|
No, earlier this week I posted the System p5 TPC benchmark announcement ( http://biz.yahoo.com/iw/060725/0147104.html ) and the first comment was "but that's not an iSeries" and it went downhill from there. What I would like to accomplish is to change attitudes from "can't do" to "can do." When I read the announcement that a p5 had broken TCP benchmarks my first thought was "Great, that'll be on an i5 in less than 6 months!" But what I heard here was: (yawn) How can we support our system with people who don't drink the kool-aid when we don't even truly support it ourselves? At the briefing I was at yesterday the biggest news was the the new version of WebSphere Whatever for iSeries had GA'd on the same day as the version for all of the other platforms. I get discouraged about the state of the iSeries community when it's all doom and gloom, and IBM doesn't care about us, etc. Regards, Scott Ingvaldson iSeries System Administrator GuideOne Insurance Group PS That 170 I was talking about is still under support and I've never had any problems with IBM about that. -----Original Message----- date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 10:52:23 -0500 from: "Haase, Justin C." <justin.haase@xxxxxxxxxxxx> subject: RE: i5 vs. p5 And IBM doesn't make a 170 anymore nor would IBM allow you to install that much memory and be supported when you had a problem. What exactly are you trying to accomplish? pFrankenseries? -- Justin C. Haase - iSeries System Engineer IBM Certified Systems Expert - System i Kingland Systems Corporation
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.