|
Bruce, I realise it's a little late to be following on to this topic, but one thing I don't see considered in the time support provided in i5/OS is the ability to handle DOUBLE DST. It appears it ASSUMES the adjustment is going to be 60 minutes. That should have been a changeable field defaulting to 60 minutes, to allow you to enter 120. Newfoundland tried double DST several years ago, I understand the subject has come up in the UK, and that parts of the former USSR use it. Neil Palmer, Cambridge, Ontario, Canada(This account not monitored for personal mail, remove the last two letters before @ for that) ----- Original Message ---- From: Bruce Vining <bvining@xxxxxxxxxx> To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Wednesday, February 1, 2006 6:08:04 PM Subject: Re: Daylight Saving Time Tom, The ability for users to change the DST rules in a time zone object is certainly there in V5R3, and was put in place as some governments change the DST observance rules every year (including deciding to skip it entirely some years) and often with very little lead time. As for the business impacts, and here I am most definitely talking for myself, I wonder about all the clocks in DVD players, cars, thermometers, etc. that are not easily re-programmed but do support DST. I have some at home and while they tend to allow me to select the time zone I am in, they don't allow me to specify the rules (or in this case changed rules) for DST start and end. Companies providing these devices may have a significant hurdle to overcome. Companies providing programmable systems (like the System i5) have more straight forward solutions. Bruce Vining Tom Jedrzejewicz <tomjedrz@xxxxxxx om> To Sent by: Midrange Systems Technical midrange-l-bounce Discussion s+bvining=us.ibm. <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx> com@xxxxxxxxxxxx cc Subject 02/01/2006 04:45 Re: Daylight Saving Time PM Please respond to Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@midra nge.com> Tom asked ... > > Can we assume that IBM will ship PTF's or otherwise make the change to > accommodate the the start (and end?) of DST changes in 2007? On 2/1/06, Bruce Vining <bvining@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > That is a reasonable expectation (once Congress decides they're really > going to make the change -- right now they've reserved the right to > withdraw the change if the impact to the business community is too great). I saw that, but I find it kind of silly. By the time we figure out what the costs are, they wil have already been spent making the change. I also noticed that the capability exists to change the start and end DS date/times, so it may be left to us to do. -- Tom Jedrzejewicz tomjedrz@xxxxxxxxx
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.