RE: Outbound fax from 400

Douglas,

I thought I had seen .08 per page on their web page.

You might be correct in that it's .05 per 30secs.  That seems to ring a bell.  
As I vaguely recall looking at logs where our mostly 1 page faxes were being 
billed .05 or .10 each depending on basically how fast the customers equipment 
was.

Note that it's been a couple of years since I worked at the company I set this 
up at.  But I do know that the email-to-fax via Maxemail is still in use.


HTH,

Charles Wilt
--
iSeries Systems Administrator / Developer
Mitsubishi Electric Automotive America
ph: 513-573-4343
fax: 513-398-1121
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Douglas Handy
> Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 3:41 PM
> To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
> Subject: Re: Outbound fax from 400
> 
> 
> Charles,
> 
> Given that the numbers are mostly long distance, the .08 a 
> page Maxemail
> > charges would probably be pretty close to what the long 
> distance changes
> > would be anyways.
> 
> 
> This will be one of the things we consider. When I look at 
> the maxemail
> website, it seems charges are .05 per 30 seconds, not .08 per 
> page. Which
> plan are you using?
> 
> LD charges these days are pretty cheap. I think they use a T1 
> direct to a
> POP bypassing the LEC charges, so their rates are way lower 
> than 10 cents
> per minute. Still, since it avoids any need for new hardware, 
> software, or
> ongoing maintenance, this may be a very viable option considering the
> relatively low volume.
> 
> Doug
> -- 
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion 
> (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
> To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
> 
>