× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



The thing you will also want to consider is the security of the servers
doing the faxing when using internet based solutions.

Gregory A. Garner
Garner Data Systems, Inc
4270 Grand Teton Parkway
Suwanee, GA 30024
Phone: 770 845 9636  Fax:770 614 3496

-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Wilt, Charles
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 4:03 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: RE: Outbound fax from 400

Douglas,

I thought I had seen .08 per page on their web page.

You might be correct in that it's .05 per 30secs.  That seems to ring a
bell.  As I vaguely recall looking at logs where our mostly 1 page faxes
were being billed .05 or .10 each depending on basically how fast the
customers equipment was.

Note that it's been a couple of years since I worked at the company I set
this up at.  But I do know that the email-to-fax via Maxemail is still in
use.


HTH,

Charles Wilt
--
iSeries Systems Administrator / Developer
Mitsubishi Electric Automotive America
ph: 513-573-4343
fax: 513-398-1121
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Douglas Handy
> Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 3:41 PM
> To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
> Subject: Re: Outbound fax from 400
> 
> 
> Charles,
> 
> Given that the numbers are mostly long distance, the .08 a 
> page Maxemail
> > charges would probably be pretty close to what the long 
> distance changes
> > would be anyways.
> 
> 
> This will be one of the things we consider. When I look at 
> the maxemail
> website, it seems charges are .05 per 30 seconds, not .08 per 
> page. Which
> plan are you using?
> 
> LD charges these days are pretty cheap. I think they use a T1 
> direct to a
> POP bypassing the LEC charges, so their rates are way lower 
> than 10 cents
> per minute. Still, since it avoids any need for new hardware, 
> software, or
> ongoing maintenance, this may be a very viable option considering the
> relatively low volume.
> 
> Doug
> -- 
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion 
> (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
> To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
> 
> 


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.