|
The world is always changing and will continue to change, we have to change with it. I would point out that to get this web service running on WAS Express you probably had to configure the server and learn all of the application install procedures, all one time tasks. Your MS guys spent plenty of time doing this already, they just did it years ago. Get a copy of WDSC and give it a test run. If you're looking for faster application deployment you might need to pony up for WAS Network Deployment, you can't do it all with the free tools. I took a class on WAS ND V6 last month and this new verision includes a Rapid Application Deployment feature that allows you to drop your .ear or .jar files into a specified directory and RAD will automagically install or reinstall the application on your specified server. And it all runs on iSeries. The things that you are dreaming of do exist. Try iSeries Access for Wireless (5722XP1) It's included with the O/S, probably on the cd's you've got in your desk (at least V5R2 and up). This includes a wizard that will set up and configure both itself and WAS or WAS Express. Then watch the look on your MS guys faces when you tell them you're upgrading your system from your cell phone or Blackberry while camping next weekend. The bigger issue here is that many of us are trying to compete with teams running the newest O/S on the latest and greatest hardware, and we're trying to keep up while running V4R5 on a six year old box with no time or budget for updates. How many of us have Windows boxes that spend hours sending us data across the network when they could be running on an IXS and writing directly to our DASD? Not to mention being automagically included in our D/R plan... Instead of hanging our heads when others refer to us as a "legacy system" we have to let them know that iSeries is the future. When a hot dog asks "what does it run, Windows 2003 server?" we can say "Yes! And AIX and Linux and i5/OS and soon z/OS." We're going to take over the world... Regards, Scott Ingvaldson iSeries System Administrator GuideOne Insurance Group -----Original Message----- date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 09:38:08 -0600 from: "Rick DuVall" <R_C_DuVall@xxxxxxxxxx> subject: RE: Green screen to GUI Hi Jeff, I have felt the same for a long time. It is annoying/embarrassing/exasperating to be talking to someone outside the company about a project, explaining that we are running on the As/400-iSeries-i5, only to be met with the 'Oh, that's one of those old legacy machines isn't it?' or something similar. There is nothing I can say. I've tried all the possibilities - 'Dear, the AS/400 was a 64 bit powerhouse while Windows was only...' and so forth. Anything I say has no effect - for the most part - they don't have the knowledge or experience to comprehend. The only thing that would make a dent in their smug dismissal would be a true graphical interface and the tools to make easy use of it. We had better admit it - we live in a graphical world. All the integration/stability/security in the world will not win over the uneducated/inexperienced, but one simple graphical interface can start the process. (a picture is worth more than a thousand words) I have been an c/rpg programmer since 1988 - mostly rpg. I use subprocedures and ILE and make use of the various API's available when needed. I have taken classes and read about java - we even use it extensively in xml processing. But I have just spent the previous week or so blundering through trying to get a web service to run on WAS Express 5.0. I finally succeeded, but my point is the Microsoft guys I have worked with would jeeringly state - 'I could have had that done in two hours on a microsoft platform with microsoft tools.' AND THEY ARE RIGHT! I've seen it. DAMMIT! I don't know what the answer is - I was interviewing a guy the other day - bright guy - late 20's with a masters degree in cs - a real hot dog. He asked what kind of server we ran and I replied with the 'IBM iSeries' string. He replied yeah, but what does it run, Windows 2003 server? He had no idea what I was talking about. I don't know where I am going with this - I guess I'm just blowing off steam. But I am getting tired of everybody else (non-iSeries) blowing through projects that I have to sweat blood to perform. I need some tools that are on a par with Micro$oft's. I need wizards that ACTUALLY WORK! Everything has to be ARCANE! Even the simplest things have some little part of it obfuscated in the manuals that make it a major effort to implement. Oh well, like Jeff said - Back to work... Regards and apologies for ranting Rick DuVall Systems Manager Dealer's Auto Auction of Okc 405 947-2886 Ext:143 rick@xxxxxxxxxx -----Original Message----- From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Jeff Crosby Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 7:19 AM To: 'Midrange Systems Technical Discussion' Subject: Green screen to GUI There's an interesting discussion on iSeries Network about the perception of the AS400/iSeries/i5. In the area of green screen vs GUI, a poster makes the following observation (pay particular attention to the second paragraph): <thepost> IBM's Developer's Road Map is IBM's way of recusing itself from dealing with the reality of the green-screen dilemma. Even if you accept the WebSphere value proposition, there's a chasm between the green-screen environment and the full-tilt Java/RPG/WebSphere environment IBM wants for its customers. IBM proposes HATS and WebFacing: HATS is limited use; WebFacing is not much different than being invited to tie the noose at your own hanging. CGIDEV won't die, in spite of IBM's bumbling efforts to treat it like an old Eskimo (push it out on an ice floe and let it die). Since the early 70's, IBM has, generally speaking, provided an integrated solution for midrange customers. Consider IBM's investment in the S/36-to-AS/400 conversion and the AS/400 S/36 environment, and you have to wonder how IBM could miss the strategic importance of having a Blue Roadmap for the moving to browser-based applications instead of throwing the responsibility out to 3rd parties. I believe moving off green-screen applications is the most signficant change the iSeries community has ever faced, and IBM's response has been to stand on the other side of the river, waving, and saying the water's not too cold. </thepost> Until I read the above, I (in the words of the caller to Mr Obvious on Bob & Tom) had "never made the connection". It suddenly dawned on me how well IBM handled things for us S/36 customers going to an AS/400. It was a complete solution, end-to-end, at your company's pace, one step at a time, everything covered to the nth degree. That's what IBM did, "provide a complete integrated solution for midrange customers" which is how IBM cultivated such loyalty, while at the same time, we, as customers, could concentrate on business solutions. Contrast that with burger flipping ads. IBM completely missed what was needed when it came to green screen to GUI. Oh well. Back to work. -- Jeff Crosby Dilgard Frozen Foods, Inc.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.