|
I simply don't agree with this sentiment. As far as I can tell, IBM has done EXACTLY the same thing for the GUI environment as they did for the S/36. 1. They created an environment where your old programs would run. S36EE for the S/36 folks, and WebFacing or HATS for the 5250 world. 2. They created a completely different programming paradigm for new development. This is RPG/ILE for the S/36 folks, and WebSphere for the green screen folks. The only "pure" conversion was to S36EE. You cannot run S/36 source code natively on the iSeries. There's no conversion tool to take existing S/36 code and seamlessly turn it into service programs. Heck, it's hard to turn RPG II code into RPG III; I know, I converted an entire financial package once. Just converting internally described files to externally described files was a major endeavor. So, IBM let you run in S/36 mode, and that was good enough for many people (there are still shops out there on S36EE). However, the vast majority of shops eventually converted up to RPG III, and some have even made the transition to RPG IV and ILE. Some, but by no means all, because it requires an investment of time and money. But S36 developers paid that cost. When did they learn PLISTs? Or subfiles? Or DDS? They didn't have any of this on the S/36, yet they learned it all. IBM didn't learn it for them. The move from green to GUI is even more traumatic. While RPG II to RPG III+ was primarily syntactic, the change from green to GUI is much more like the change from RPG III to service programs and ILE; it requires a complete change of mindset. There is no magic conversion tool that will allow you to do it. But you CAN do it. It's not really that difficult, just challenging. But you have to be willing to spend the time and money to do it. I can teach you how to create robust client/server applications using JSP and a very thin layer of Java, with all the back-end processing in RPG, in a week. But then you still have to be ready to write your RPG code as servers, and be ready to start thinking in terms of HTML and CSS rather than 5250 display attributes. And if you aren't willing to make that investment, then IBM has once again provided you a legacy environment with HATS and WebFacing. Or you can spend a littler more and get an advanced tool like PSC/400. In either case, you don't have to upgrade your skill set any more than you did with the S36EE environment. Joe > From: Jeff Crosby > > Until I read the above, I (in the words of the caller to Mr Obvious on Bob > & > Tom) had "never made the connection". It suddenly dawned on me how well > IBM > handled things for us S/36 customers going to an AS/400. It was a > complete > solution, end-to-end, at your company's pace, one step at a time, > everything > covered to the nth degree. That's what IBM did, "provide a complete > integrated solution for midrange customers" which is how IBM cultivated > such > loyalty, while at the same time, we, as customers, could concentrate on > business solutions.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.