|
Lot of pearls there Pete. The virtual lan capability cannot be used on the Citrix servers. Some strange incompatibility. Therefore you lose that big boost of performance that data integration between IXS data and OS/400 data would benefit from. Net people still like it on the IXS cards though. We've done some saves, restores, and total unload/reloads and they think the IXS ain't bad. I'm not impressed with PASE. What benefit is there to running the application you mentioned in PASE versus a linux partition or some other dedicated box? I don't see any data integration. What soured me on PASE was the PASE based version of TSM. Apparently the PASE tape API's are only capable of driving our 3582's at 1/3rd the speed of native OS/400 commands. And IBM flat out says it's the tape pase api's. So bad they've abandoned any OS/400 based, (pase or otherwise) version of TSM and suggest you throw up a Linux partition. Rob Berendt -- Group Dekko Services, LLC Dept 01.073 PO Box 2000 Dock 108 6928N 400E Kendallville, IN 46755 http://www.dekko.com Pete Helgren <Pete@xxxxxxxxxx> Sent by: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx 05/16/2005 02:46 PM Please respond to Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx> To Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx> cc Subject Re: Terminal server.. We did this with an earlier model of AS/400 (a model 270 with an 800Mhz IPCS) It worked well but we didn't see an inherent advantage to having the "integration" of the IPCS. If you have apps that use something like MS Access or other apps that are moving a lot of data to/from the iSeries, the "integrated" approach is great because of the virtual lan connection between the x-server and iSeries is fast, otherwise, we didn't have a compelling reason to continue down that path. However, as I understand it, the cross-management capabilities have improved. We are looking at using VNC in the PASE environment to serve up X-Windows desktops that do just 5250 and web browsing. In that environment, everything runs on the iSeries with no other hardware required. Most X-Windows clients are supported. Pete Helgren Pete Helgren Shields, Ken wrote: >Marsha started this thread, and I'm very curious about this method as well. > > Windows Terminal Server/Thin Client/AS400 > > All input appreciated.. > >Thanks everyone... > > >Ken Shields >PPG Canada Inc >Ph: 905 725 1144 (326) >Fx: 905 433 8712 >kenshields@xxxxxxx > > > > -- This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.