|
rob@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > > Frankly I would rather not have a site limited in functionality because to > get some desired function would require something that 1% of the browsers > in existence do not use. You can't tractor on the interstate; don't take > limited browsers on the information superhighway. That's an absurd analogy, and you know it. "ANY BROWSER" compatibility simply means avoiding browser-specific nonstandard constructs, and designing pages to "degrade gracefully" with older browsers. It's no different from what I've been doing lately in QuestView: even though many of its newest capabilities are meaningless on less than a V4R2, V4R4, or V4R5 system (in at least one case, it can recognize data that can only exist on, I believe, V5R3 or later), it will still run perfectly well on a V2R3 box. -- James H. H. Lampert Professional Dilettante http://www.hb.quik.com/jamesl http://members.hostedscripts.com/antispam.html http://www.thehungersite.com Help America's Passenger Trains. http://www.saveamtrak.org Read My Lips: No More Atrocities!
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
