|
"Jones, John (US)" wrote: > Don't degrade gracefully; enhance appropriately. That's the better > business decision as the company's goal should be to reach the desired > audience first and add 'wow factor' and advanced functionality for the > advanced/up-to-date/fringe audience members later. Two sides of the same coin: if you code to a browser-independent standard, then "enhance appropriately," then a graceful degradation is assured. Of course, everything is relative to the target audience of a web site: if it is for internal use in a large corporation where official corporate software standards are enforced on a draconian or even fascist level, then browser-independence is irrelevant (but in such an environment, why bother with a web site or browsers at all?) Likewise, if the raison d'etre of one's web site is to distribute Flash content, then graceful degradation is simply a matter of turning away incompatible clients at the home page. But since my own web site is targeted at the general public, and the content is pure HTML, I choose to develop one that doesn't care what browser is used. -- James H. H. Lampert Professional Dilettante http://www.hb.quik.com/jamesl http://members.hostedscripts.com/antispam.html http://www.thehungersite.com Help America's Passenger Trains. http://www.saveamtrak.org Read My Lips: No More Atrocities!
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.