Re: PTF's affecting system operation?

He!! of a qualifier there - "non-defective".  I think that's their 
concern.

Rob Berendt
-- 
Group Dekko Services, LLC
Dept 01.073
PO Box 2000
Dock 108
6928N 400E
Kendallville, IN 46755
http://www.dekko.com





Reeve <rfritchman@xxxxxxxxx> 
Sent by: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
01/13/2005 09:26 PM
Please respond to
Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>


To
Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc

Subject
Re: PTF's affecting system operation?






I didn't inquire about the status of their production systems; I doubt
they're current.  I can see applying a PTF to a test box first, and I
can even see considering some regression testing on the test box.  But
I'm unaware of any non-defective PTF that's caused a change in
behavior in a "normal" application.

-rf 


On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 10:50:46 -0500, Walden H. Leverich
<WaldenL@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >A customer tells me they haven't applied PTF's to their development
> >V5R2 S20 (sigh) in a year because they "don't want to affect the
> >testing environment".
> 
> Have they applied the PTFs in production? Or is this a case of wanting
> the testing environment to match production? I can see not applying a
> PTF in test until you're willing to apply it in production[1], but if
> production has the PTF and test doesn't I'd say you're invalidating the
> test anyway.
> 
> -Walden
> 
> [1] Obviously you would apply the PTF in test and if ok, then in
> production. But the idea is one follows closely w/the other.
> 
> ------------
> Walden H Leverich III
> President & CEO
> Tech Software
> (516) 627-3800 x11
> WaldenL@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.TechSoftInc.com
> 
> Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur.
> (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.)
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Reeve
> Sent: Wednesday, 12 January, 2005 21:34
> To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
> Subject: PTF's affecting system operation?
> 
> A customer tells me they haven't applied PTF's to their development
> V5R2 S20 (sigh) in a year because they "don't want to affect the
> testing environment".
> 
> I go back to the System/38 pre-announcement meetings as an IBM'er and
> have never heard this prattle before.  We expect such behavior with
> Windows (actually, it doesn't even take a service pack, it just takes
> another keystroke) but not with OS/400.  And since it's my application
> in the testing environment, I'm reasonably (as in as close to 100% as
> possible) sure there's nothing application-dependent going on.
> 
> Is this a CYA crock or is there merit in the customer's statement?
> 
> Thanks,
> Reeve
> --
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
> list
> To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
> 
> --
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing 
list
> To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
> 
>
-- 
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing 
list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.