× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



midrange-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

>   2. Re: electronic voting tomorrow (rob@xxxxxxxxx)
>
>Nothing is trusted anyway.  Not paper ballots.  Not mechanical paper 
>ballots (hanging chads).  Nothing.  There will always be an argument 
>saying why it's bad.  Thus, should all attempts to improve be permanently 
>shelved?  After all, if it's all going to be tied up in the courts anyway, 
>why spend the money on trying to improve the equipment when it could be 
>better spent on something less controversial?
>
>Rob Berendt


So, you'd be comfortable with a scenario like...

You go to the polls and find the new Vote-O-Matic e-voting machines made by The 
Tom, Co., collecting all votes. And you choose to vote against Bob Badguy 
'cuz... well, 'cuz you think he's a bad guy. Bob wins, of course, and the 
electronic results show it clearly.

You're curious about it though, so you ask to review the procedures and find 
out that the software is proprietary and you're not allowed to review it. 
Hmmm...

You also do some digging and learn that Bob was an early investor in The Tom, 
Co., and still is a large stockholder. Hmmm...

With paper ballot counting, it's possible for observers actually to watch the 
counting process. But the e-vote systems in use in the U.S. today?

Sorry, dude. You just have to take the word of the vendors that (1) there are 
no hidden sections of code that only run on the First Tuesday in November, (2) 
that there are no possibilities of remote manipulation via wireless or internet 
even when network access to the vote repository database is possible, and 
(3)...??? All the "testing" in the world won't tell you what you _need_ to 
know; it will only tell you that the result was correct for the test runs.

If ever open-source was a rational path, e-voting systems is certainly a prime 
case. Few seem totally put off by e-voting as such. The complaints are mostly 
with how it's being implemented in secrecy.

Tom Liotta

-- 
Tom Liotta
The PowerTech Group, Inc.
19426 68th Avenue South
Kent, WA 98032
Phone  253-872-7788 x313
Fax    253-872-7904
http://www.powertech.com


__________________________________________________________________
Switch to Netscape Internet Service.
As low as $9.95 a month -- Sign up today at http://isp.netscape.com/register

Netscape. Just the Net You Need.

New! Netscape Toolbar for Internet Explorer
Search from anywhere on the Web and block those annoying pop-ups.
Download now at http://channels.netscape.com/ns/search/install.jsp

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.