|
> Instead of just stuffing the ballots in a box they would be inserted into > the reader. Thats why the infrared port some electronic devices have should be disabled (not just taped over...) ----- Original Message ----- From: "York, Albert" <albert.york@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: "'Midrange Systems Technical Discussion'" <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 5:40 PM Subject: RE: electronic voting tomorrow > I think a reasonable solution would be portable ballot readers on site. > Instead of just stuffing the ballots in a box they would be inserted into > the reader. It would validate that the ballot was punched correctly and > could periodically dial up a central server to send interim results. > > Albert York > > > -----Original Message----- > From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of rob@xxxxxxxxx > Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 1:56 PM > To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion > Subject: RE: electronic voting tomorrow > > Do paper ballots have instant offsite backup in case of fire or flood? > Did paper ballots stop the absentee ballot from the dead guy that made the > news? > With electronic journalling of all records, will it be harder for a local > clerk to abscond with some paper ballots? > > I am sure that it will go to the Supreme Court. Being gracious and > accepting defeat has gone the way of the dodo bird. It's like trying to > get a law passed. Don't want to bother? Have it done by judicial fiat > instead. > > Rob Berendt > -- > Group Dekko Services, LLC > Dept 01.073 > PO Box 2000 > Dock 108 > 6928N 400E > Kendallville, IN 46755 > http://www.dekko.com > > > > > > "Dan Bale" <dbale@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent by: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx > 11/01/2004 04:42 PM > Please respond to > Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > To > "Midrange Systems Technical Discussion" <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > cc > > Fax to > > Subject > RE: electronic voting tomorrow > > > > > > > I trust paper ballots far, FAR more than electronic ballots. Not even > close. No contest. > > As I see it, the big difference between paper and electronic is that with > paper, you always have the physical evidence. You can see why there are > unexpected discrepancies and the causes (hanging chads, etc.) I can look > at > my ballot and match it up to the legend that I punched it from. (And I > always do this.) > > With electronic voting, no one, with the *possible* exception of the > person(s) who wrote the programs, knows what happens exactly when a screen > button is pushed. A vote bit is sent through a gamut of instructions for > which there are zero auditing capabilities. It lands in a pool, > hopefully, > and in the right pool, hopefully. If someone screams "cheat!", how will > anyone ever verify? To my knowledge, the auditing capabilities are > totally > insufficient. > > If you're cynical about what happens to a paper ballot after you return it > to be counted, well then, you're not doubting the technology so much as > you > are the people responsible for ensuring every vote counts. This type of > cynicism precedes our lifetime. > > Overall, if "the people" lose the trust of the electoral process, it is an > open invitation to anarchy. > > Who's giving odds that this election won't go before the Supreme Court > again? > > db > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx / rob@xxxxxxxxx > > Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 4:21 PM > > > > Nothing is trusted anyway. Not paper ballots. Not mechanical paper > > ballots (hanging chads). Nothing. There will always be an argument > > saying why it's bad. Thus, should all attempts to improve be > permanently > > shelved? After all, if it's all going to be tied up in the > > courts anyway, > > why spend the money on trying to improve the equipment when it could be > > better spent on something less controversial? > > > > Rob Berendt > > -- > This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing > list > To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, > visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l > or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx > Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives > at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l. > > > -- > This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list > To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, > visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l > or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx > Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives > at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l. > -- > This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list > To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, > visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l > or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx > Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives > at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l. > >
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.