|
Interesting; How bad is the performance, I have not tried/nor researched HPT - most of the barcode we do here has many on one page, along with graphics, boxes, fonts and the total pages per day average around 15,000 - Just wondering if we decide to get another printer, would it pay, or be too slow to even bother with HPT. Mark -----Original Message----- From: midrange-l-bounces+mmanske=minter-weisman.com@midrange.com [mailto:midrange-l-bounces+mmanske=minter-weisman.com@midrange.com]On Behalf Of Vern Hamberg Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 10:09 AM To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion Subject: RE: IPDS printer required for printing a barcode? You don't need emulation cards if you use Host Print Transform - that provides the emulation. But HPT always has the performance limitation. At 09:45 AM 2/5/2003 -0600, you wrote: >Barcode requires IPDS (type/emulation) - and compile the prtf that way; >my personal preference is to go AFPDS, even more "graphics" are available, >but either way - > >As for hardware, any printer that is capable of IPDS emulation will work, >we are running barcodes on HP and Lexmark here. > >The HP has a "blue box" ipds emulation, I do not recall how the lexmarks >are set up, but they are straight IP, no twin-ax lines. > >You can also; depending on your HP model, get a card for emulation, or even >a special chip that goes on the logic board. > >HTH > >Mark
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.