|
On 17 Dec 2002 at 0:28, James W. Kilgore wrote: [snip] > > As a 25+ year professional, I support quality, and IMHO, the > AS/400-iSeries is as good as it gets. My clients, the REAL survivors > of ANY economy, also seek quality. The acquisition of quality is WHY > they are the survivors! > When I first started in what used to be called "DP", back mumblety-mumble years ago, the prevailing wisdom was that the death-rattle was sounding in RPG's throat, and that the micro would kill the midrange. Well, here I am today writing apps in RPG, and writing clients in VB/C etc. to talk to socket servers on my AS/400 (the prevailing wisdom department, as I recall, delcared the 400 terminally ill about 10 years ago), and it all serves the business just fine. I should confess at this point. I was singing the dirge right along with all the other "wise" folks, for I was a server/array & *nix bigot. I have seen the light... I agree with James. I think businesses tend to adopt what in their experience works, and not deviate a heck of a lot from that. Someone (apologies in advance, I forget who) weighed in with the statement that he was running Linux servers with little difficulty and 99%+ uptime. So, how are you going to convince that person that he should make a change away from something he knows that he can deploy in such a way that it is stable and not disruptive to the business? I think that the 400's incredible stability is due, at least in part, to the tight integration between the hardware and the operating system. This provides a degree of fault tolerance and management that is, in my opinion, technically unequaled on any comparable platform (including *nix). That stability and performance, however, are also affected by proper configuration. Whether its OS/400, *nix, or Windoze, if you have hardware that is not equal to the load you place on it, you are going to experience instability and poor performance. [snip] > > There are many participants on this list that would enjoy a truly > lucid, logical, honest discussion of the merits of any technical, > economical business solution that benefits both your career and those > that employ you. > [snip] I've been more successful writing 3 & 4 tiered apps on the iSeries than any other platform. I think that this is because of the high level of integration between the database and the operating system, and the resultant increase in OS services available to the programmer. There are a lot of people here with a lot of technical knowledge and a willingness to share it, including Joe and Konrad. I agree with James, we'd all benefit by such a discussion. I have learned much lurking about here, and I feel much gratitude to the people who participate in this list. Remember, before you say anything bad about anybody, that you shoud walk a mile in their shoes. That way, if you still need to say something insulting, you're a mile away and you've got their shoes.... [snip] Happy holidays to all! --Chris
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.