|
Mr. Nelson states : "We need to turn around the argument that the offshore can do the work for less money to one where the work is done with higher quality in less time. " The answer to that statement is very simple, and it has everything to do with cost. When we go to Wal-Mart to buy a shirt, it's made somewhere other than the U.S.A., but we don't care because it's inexpensive. The shirt's quality, while usually less than desirable, is acceptable because of the price of the shirt. Translated into software, just look at Windows...we can't stand the fact that we have to reboot 2 times a week, but the $110.00 price tag for the OS offsets our frustration. Hence, a U.S. company has a strong financial incentive to use offshore labor because while the quality may be lacking (and this is debatable as time goes by), the price for that labor is so damn cheap, they don't care. Finally, outsourcing turns labor into a capitalized cost instead of a long-term commitment involving labor disputes, last productivity due to illness, insurance, retirement issues, and so forth. So, what's the solution? I don't know, but I do know that preaching quality ain't gonn'a save our jobs, so let's explore other avenues too. Just my .02 worth. :-) Ray Shahan "Life is what happens while you're busy making other plans", John Lennon
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.