Re: Interactive Feature Upgrade Theory -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Re: Interactive Feature Upgrade Theory
From: "Nathan M. Andelin" <nandelin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2002 10:30:16 -0600
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l>,<mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l>,<mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

> From: "Andy Nolen-Parkhouse" <aparkhouse@attbi.com>
> New in V4R5, the system attempts to hold interactive CPU
> utilization below the threshold where CFINT CPU usage
> begins to increase.

Sounds kind of like dynamically assigning a low priority to all 5250
sessions, and reducing their maximum time slice to something like 50
milliseconds, thus allowing the normal load balancing algorithms to take
effect, which would shift priority to batch.

Nathan M. Andelin
www.relational-data.com

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.