× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



From: Nathan M. Andelin <nandelin@RELATIONAL-DATA.COM>
> > From: <Chris.Whisonant@comporium.com>
> > The dilemma is whether to stick with our 240 CPW or
> > pay our fair share of the "tax" and step up to 560 CPW.
> My understanding is that while CPU speed may vary from one model to the
> next, CPW is supposed to be a fairly constant measurement of capacity
across
> all models.  240 CPW may represent 50% of CPU utilization on one box, but
> only 25% of CPU utilization on another.  On a box with a faster processor,
> the interactive governor just kicks in at a lower utilization threshold.

this is correct. You don't get more interactive processing by buying
a faster box.



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.