|
> From: <Chris.Whisonant@comporium.com> > The dilemma is whether to stick with our 240 CPW or > pay our fair share of the "tax" and step up to 560 CPW. Chris, My understanding is that while CPU speed may vary from one model to the next, CPW is supposed to be a fairly constant measurement of capacity across all models. 240 CPW may represent 50% of CPU utilization on one box, but only 25% of CPU utilization on another. On a box with a faster processor, the interactive governor just kicks in at a lower utilization threshold. Nathan M. Andelin www.relational-data.com
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.