|
> -----Original Message----- > From: Reeve Fritchman > > I was challenging Joe's list of 10**8 reasons why his approach is better > than everything else on the planet, including sliced bread and > canned peas. It's not my approach, Reeve, it's fundamental C/S architecture. Implementations of encapsulated servers for the IBM midrange date at least back to the 80's, and the general idea of encapsulation is even older. And while this architecture may not be economically appropriate for every case, if you don't use encapsulation, you should at least be making an informed business decision and consciously choosing against it. That's all I ever try to provide: an informed choice. Because design decisions really can be quantitatively better than one another from a pure architecture standpoint, and deciding which one to use should always take that into account. > Not that many of his points don't have some (if not a lot of merit), of > course... I'm glad to see I'm not *just* spouting gibberish. Joe Pluta www.plutabrothers.com
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.