|
Hi John On Saturday 13 October 2001 10:20 pm, jpcarr@tredegar.com wrote: [snip] > > Leif, Martin > > I agree with both of you that there are some powerful functions in the > QSH, My point is > > I wish I had a sanitized, Keyword Driven, visible Default Value, F1 F4 > aware, interface for them. > The ( jar -cfM myfile.zip file1.csv.......) is a good example Just > look at it. letting the F1 F4 issue aside for a moment, wouldn't it > be better to have that function look like > > CPYF FROMFILE(mylib/myfile) TOFILE(somelib/somefile) etc ??? You're preaching to the converted. I like the power & flexibility of the *nix tools, with the idea of doing one thing, and doing it really well, but the command syntax sucks ;-) I would love commands to be promptable and to be able to get help whilst prompting. It's easy enough (on Linux at least) to get help *before* running the command, but not once you start typing it. I usually search back through command history[1] to pull back a command that did what I wanted, rather than try to figure out all the options again. As an example, doing some video capture on my home box from the commandline: lavrec -f a -i P -d 1 -q 100 -R l -c 2 -s -r 44100 -a 16 -v 2 svcd.avi As I've used it a lot, I know what the flags & arguments (parameters ;-) mean, but it doesn't look very self explanatory. Throw in some pipes and yet more commands and it gets really hairy. In my case I usually opt for the gui, where I can set the options much like command prompting in a Graphical Access session. > I love the Pipeing too Leif but it's not a "To Unix or Not to Unix" > I would like a simple parameter on the DSPMSGD MSGID(mymsgf/msgid) > PIPETO(mylib/myfile) doncha think that and others like it would be > neat??? Definitely agreed. > Sorry I was misconstrued. I want understandable KeyWords, Visible > Defaults, F1 F4 prompting, Like I have already have had for 20 years. > It's like going back to Sys/34 Procs with Positional Parameters like > > MYPROC y,,Myfile,.*FIRST,N,,2,mylib ( what the @#$% does that do??) > > We grew past that syntax, but Linux, and Unix never did. > > I want the Function of QSH, with MY CMD interface. > > Just My Opinion. I think it's the opinion of quite a number of us :-) I want a CMD interface on my Linux box too... > P.S. I also agree with your position on Ops Nav too Leif. > > John Carr Regards, Martin -- martin@dbg400.net / jamaro@firstlinux.net http://www.dbg400.net DBG/400 - DataBase Generation utilities Open Source test environment tools for the AS/400 / iSeries and miscellaneous database & spooled file management commands.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.