RE: Problem with INS on new 270

[Chris Bipes <chris.bipes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Actually it is the second FSIOP P133 that IBM came out with.  I did not know
about the restrictions with the new INS cards and there for erroneously
posted my configuration.  Shortly after pressing the SEND, I received the
message about the INS not supporting the *BASE.  Learn something new every
day.


Christopher K. Bipes    mailto:ChrisB@Cross-Check.com
Sr. Programmer/Analyst  mailto:Chris_Bipes@Yahoo.com
CrossCheck, Inc.        http://www.cross-check.com
6119 State Farm Drive   Phone: 707 586-0551 x 1102
Rohnert Park CA  94928  Fax: 707 586-1884

If consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, only geniuses work here.
Karen Herbelin - Readers Digest 3/2000

-----Original Message-----
From: Larry Bolhuis [mailto:lbolhuis@arbsol.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2000 12:15 PM
To: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
Subject: Re: Problem with INS on new 270


Model 400's would be running FSIOPs or at best the 333 SPD packaged INS.
Both of those support *BASE (and will still run OS/2 Lanserver and
Netware too!)

+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---