× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: Re: Java Benchmarks - AS/400 Kicks - A#$
  • From: jpcarr@xxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2000 11:56:33 -0400


I think you missed a couple of pieces of Information Leif,   The two
paragraphs were talking about different number of concurrent connections.
Starting with  "In additional Testing Using....."
                                                                 
                                                                 
                                                                 



John Carr


> IBM's AS/400e Model 840 server is the first to achieve a six-digit score
on
> Volano LLC's VolanoMarkTM 2.1.2 local performance benchmark. In testing
> performed by IBM following the VolanoMark run rules, a 24-way AS/400e
Model
> 840 server with 4GB of memory handled a record 108,153 messages per
second
> using 200 concurrent connections -- more than four times faster than
Sun's
> E6500 22-way server with 30GB of memory running the Solaris operating
> environment.


Leif Said;

the next paragraph reads:

In additional testing using VolanoMark's network scalability test, a 12-way
AS/400e Model 840-2418 using a single Gigabit Ethernet connection surpassed
all previous results. The AS/400e server with 8GB of memory was able to
process 39,529 messages per second at 9,000 connections -- more than eight
times the results of the Sun E6500 22-way server.


So, 108,153 messages/second was more than FOUR times Sun's E6500 22-way
server
and   39,529 messages/second was more than EIGHT times Sun's E6500 22-way
server.

Clearly someone got some numbers screwed up here casting doubt on the whole
thing. Also, the first benchmark used 200 connections, the next 9000
connections.
Something is not right here. Don't just be hornswoggled by marketing hype.
Think
a bit yourself...

Actually, the two paragraphs are not strictly speaking contradictory.
Assume
that
Sun's server could only handle 10 messages/seconds, then both paragraphs
would
be true, since 108,153 is MORE than 4*10 and 39,529 is MORE than 8*10.  :-)





+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.