|
> Nevertheless, I agree with you that you have to be > careful when someone publishes numbers like this. Whoever does the > publishing will pick the particular tests that show their machines in the > best light and 'forget' those that don't. yeah, just like when a Microsoft sponsored 'independent' test showed that NT was 3 times faster than Linux... Now, it is correct (and good) that the AS/400 no longer is so slow as it used to be (c.f. Phil Hall). Another interesting comparison is to divide the benchmark throughput by the price of the system to get messages/second/dollar. +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.