× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: RE: RPG Cycle (was Reinventing Code)
  • From: Colin Williams <Williamsc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 6 Apr 1999 16:24:32 +0100

In many of the examples that I have seen, a logic cycle program can
start off fairly simple, and relatively easy to understand. 

Over the years, with lots of mods, enhancements, error fixes, etc., The
code becomes ineviably more complex and harder to understand. 

I remember one program.....arrays for subfiles + logic cycle + and
indicators on the left. 

I only had to make a small change to it, which should have been easy. 

Two weeks later..... 

I thought it was just me, until another guy had to make some changes to
it, and confirmed to me that this bad boy was a nightmare. I think they
had to re-write this one in the end, it was so bad. 

-----Original Message-----
From: boothm@ibm.net [mailto:boothm@ibm.net]
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 1999 3:00 PM
To: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
Subject: RE: RPG Cycle (was Reinventing Code)


RANT(*AGHAST)

Can this be true?  I am sitting here absolutely flabbergasted that
anyone would teach RPG and not require a thourough grounding in the
cycle.  

RANT(*LARGE)

The concept is so simple, and the results so predictable that any one
that ignores the cycle is ignoring one of RPG's greatest strengths.
Additionally, there is so much cycle code out there right now, how can
an instructor not teach the cycle?  How can a programmer claim to be an
RPG programmer and not understand the cycle?  

RANT(*LARGER)

Are these people that started with a C course in college and feel they
are the last great cowboy and its up to them to  preserve the Code of
the West by rolling their own?  

RANT(*OFF)



In <415593AAC1B1D111B21100600856D2080E2902@TECHNOCRATS01>, on 04/06/99 
   at 10:16 AM, Colin Williams <Williamsc@technocrats.co.uk> said:


>Remember, many RPG programmers have not used the logic cycle much, if
at
>all. So why introduce code that going to take someone a week to
>understand 

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------
boothm@ibm.net
Booth Martin
-----------------------------------------------------------

+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to
MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator:
david@midrange.com
+---
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.