|
Hi all: Needed to add my two cents on certification. All certification means is that an individual met certain test requirements on a specific date and time. It says nothing for that individual's skills following the test or even prior to the test. Several issues must be addressed. The issue of licensure needs to be addressed separately from the issues of currency and competency. Licensure: Would you have my cousin Vinny handle your legal affairs if he wasn't a licensed attorney? Currency: Would you have a doctor work on your body if his last patient was in 1950? Competency: Would you have a doctor work on your body if his only skill was doing autopsies? Would you have a tax lawyer manage a criminal trial with you as a defendant? One of the most important rationales associated with state licensure of doctors and lawyers is that there is a, "compelling state interest in protecting the public." No state in the US has made this determination regarding our profession. Currency may be testable if we had objective and standardized testing every six months or so. What would that do to the business partner pool? Do people forget that often? For example, in aviation, currency for flying in clouds must be met by either (a) six hours of instruments and six approaches within six months or (b) an instrument competency check. If this is not met for another six months, an instrument competency check (or equivalent) is mandatory. How often do people forget CFAS400, RPG IV indicator placement, etc? Competency is directly related to experience. There is no substitute for experience. Certainly certification does not imply experience. In fact, it only demonstrated one level of competency on a particular date and time. The problem as I see it is, [begin quote mode] "There are many business partner firms that have minimal or even no real AS/400 skills." [End quote mode] Certification is a way to cut out some [emphasized] of these business partners. Why should those of us with 20+ years of experience have to suffer because of those who can't figure it out? IBM's latest attempt at establishing a deadline of November 30 was not workable. They've since extended the deadline but the problem hasn't gone away. The price for the test is $300 per exam, almost as much as the two day Hawaii Bar Exam! This is certainly overpriced. At this price, we may need to examine the true motives. I hope this is not another way to just generate more income rather than reducing commissions of the business partners. There should be a way that the local IBM branch office can vouch for the skills of the business partners and let them do their job! If they mess with the business partner program too much they'll certainly wipe out many of the smaller business partner companies. I wonder if this is the true intent? JMHO Steve Glanstein mic@aloha.com +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.