× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: RE: Intel delays Merced
  • From: Neil Palmer <npalmer@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 5 Jun 1998 00:26:43 -0600

Sounds like a 'Letters to the Editor' writing campaign to PC Magazine is
called for here !!   :-)



Neil Palmer                                AS/400~~~~~      
NxTrend Technology - Canada   ____________          ___  ~     
Thornhill, Ontario,  Canada   |OOOOOOOOOO| ________  o|__||=   
Phone: (905) 731-9000  x238   |__________|_|______|_|______)   
Cell.: (416) 565-1682  x238    oo      oo   oo  oo   OOOo=o\   
Fax:   (905) 731-9202       ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 
mailto:NPalmer@NxTrend.com    AS/400  The Ultimate Business Server      
http://www.NxTrend.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roger Pence [SMTP:rp@rogerpence.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 1998 3:20 PM
> To:   MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
> Subject:      Re: Intel delays Merced
> 
> >At 10:57 PM 6/2/98 -0500, you wrote:
> >>So, if IBM gave Rochester the go-ahead we could see a 128-bit AS/400
> >>before Intel gets their lowly little 64-bit chip on the market !
> :-)
> >
> >Neil,
> >
> >Maybe so.  However the world has been so underwhelmed by 64 bit
> processing,
> >I can't see it getting excited about 96 or 128.
> >
> >What Rochester failed to do with the 64 bit AS/400 is to deliver any
> >splashy applications that clearly could not be duplicated on any
> other
> >processor.
> >
> >Al
> 
> Al--
> 
> It wasn't a 64-bit application, but it was a 64-bit technology and IBM
> _has_
> delivered it: single level store. This allows not only the ability to
> effectively manage physical storage and memory space, but also
> provides the
> mechanism with which to support persistant objects.
> 
> There is an article in the current issue of PC magazine (the one with
> 2000
> on the cover) that elaborates on the benefits of 64-bit technology and
> even
> throws a bone to those processors that deliver it today. However, was
> the
> AS/400 mentioned? Noooo. Single level storage was described as though
> it
> were nirvana and maybe, maybe someday it will be here. Sigh.
> 
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.