× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Keith,

>Are there any significant diferences in the instruction set of the S/3 and
>the MSP used in the S/34 and S/36 ?

I never did assembly on the S/3, so I can't address it.   IIRC (and it has been
a lonnngggg time), the 5340 (ie S/34) and the 5360 (ie original S/36) had
similar if not identical instructions sets.  The 5360 may have been a superset
-- I don't recall.  In any event, the instruction sets were rather sparse.
Although not technicaly RISC architecture, they always seemed to me to have a
rather reduced (ie sparse) instruction set...

The 5362 used the same instruction set as the 5360, but the 5364 (and later the
5363) added another instruction which was a duplicate of an existing
instruction.  I believe its only purpose was to inhibit SSP and LPP's from being
moved from a 5364/3 to the higher cost 5360/2 boxes.  SSP and LPP's were
compiled using the new instruction, which would cause an error if restored to a
5360/2.  HLL compilers never created objects using the new instructions so
customers could freely move load modules between any of the models.

Doug


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.