|
> "Running a system where performance relies on an undocumented hack and which > is clearly against IBM's intentions is walking on thin ice in my book." But hasn't IBM's -official- stance always been that CFINT is NOT a governor, that it is because of "technical" reasons it kicks in? You all have been arguing that this product might cause problems because it gets around a governor, but IBM has never officially admitted that that is what CFINT is. Bill _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.