If we're going to pursue this on the list, let's change the subject heading,
please.

Thanks.

Dave Shaw
MAPICS-L manager



----- Original Message ----
From: Vic Belebczuk <vbelebczuk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: MAPICS ERP System Discussion <mapics-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tue, October 30, 2012 12:05:31 PM
Subject: Re: [MAPICS-L] IM transactions via SystemLink

Group,
I do not want to see this thread become a forum questioning the value of either
Channel Partners or "non-Infor Partner personnel". Somehow the thread on
SystemLink transactions took a "left turn", perhaps due to a user's
recommendation, I'm not really sure. I totallly agree with the establishment
of this group for promoting knowledge and refraining from selling services
or showing any animosity to other members. However, since an Infor Channel
Partner brought it up, I am looking for futher clarification on the statement
"using non-Infor Partner personnel may violate the Infor license agreement and
may carry a significant financial remedy for third party access of the
customer's Infor XA system" . Since there are others that have expressed a
similar interest I chose not to take this off-line. Its critical that I
understand any potential issues to protect my company's interests.


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2021 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.