× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: Re: Closing Manufacturing Orders
  • From: Gcschramm@xxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 14:48:37 EDT

     I agree that the additional material transaction to complete material,
and the additional shop transaction to complete labor seem in most cases to
be redundant.  But Patrick asked about closing with a "C".  That is a normal
close, which tells me the order is already at 55 with PC&C or 45 without PC&C
interfacing.  In this case, selecting by date is possible, and certainly
easier than putting a "C" in each order.  If he were forcing them closed with
an "F", I would understand wanting to simplify the process.  In this case, I
think Jonathan's solution is appropriate, since, as I said, it usually is
redundant to do the completion RM transaction.
      

George C. Schramm, CPIM
Custom Systems Corporation
973.383.7808

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.