On 12-Aug-2014 10:47 -0500, rob@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
And it's not just getting the authorization lists right.
I had to rerun this:

To me this sounds like IBM has had to make a deliberate attempt to
change the authority of that command to some IBM suggested default.

In a message thread back in April [subject "V6R1 to V7R1 i5/OS DSLO image upgrade issues"], I was going to document such issues for which the only recovery [ever] will be, to apply the System Change Management as part of the "R" portion of DR. Because that [Restore Object (RSTOBJ) command authority] and other situations will always exist [for various reasons], the system owner is pretty much _required to reapply_ customizations [esp. to anything in QSYS] after any *install* of the OS, irrespective of for why the install was performed.

Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2015 by MIDRANGE dot COM and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available here. If you have questions about this, please contact