MIDRANGE dot COM Mailing List Archive



Home » MIDRANGE-L » July 2014

Re: Latest cume install time



fixed

@Holger,

It's worse than that. I've seen machines come from IBM (OK, IBM Argentina
so they might have been installed by a clueless BP) where they had 4GB on a
520, only 1GB avaiable (they had the old style partitioning when the
machine had no partitions at all) and the machine had never had a clean
shutdown in all the years since installed (LIC didn't get to dump all
changed pages to disk before it got killed by the *immed). Same machine
with an extra 4Gb and enabling of the missing 3Gb was incredible (and it
was the base 1000/60 machine)...
Best Regards,

Roberto


On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Holger Scherer <hs@xxxxxxx> wrote:

Eeeek - they had the base 2GB RAM, didnt they? I saw those machines, too.
Usually resulting
in terms like "old AS400 is crappy slow stuff, we should move our DB to a
PC".
I always wonder who is selling these configs...

-h



Am 28.07.2014 um 22:17 schrieb DrFranken <midrange@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:

YMMV of course. I know one poor soul that used an image catalog on a
Power5 520 with two drives mirrored no cache and it took like 35 hours.


--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.







Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2014 by MIDRANGE dot COM and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available here. If you have questions about this, please contact