MIDRANGE dot COM Mailing List Archive



Home » MIDRANGE-L » October 2012

Re: Callback



fixed

LOL

Yeah, John - I knew after I wrote that post that it might be confusing - I think your replies are making things clear.

So readdir() does not do a callback or exit - it returns the next entry in the directory. So you have to manage the loop, whereas the loop is internal to the other API - whose name I can't remember more than 5 minutes ago!!

I agree that callbacks are not intrinsically tied to repetitive processes - just that, in my experience, it seems the more typical use.

Regards
Vern

On 10/18/2012 9:27 AM, John Yeung wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 10:21 AM, John Yeung <gallium.arsenide@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 12:58 AM, Vernon Hamberg
<vhamberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Now another API is readdir() - this one returns a structure for the NEXT
item it finds in the directory - so YOU have to run this in a loop until
no more objects are found. The first API itself contains the processing
loop - that first API seems to fit the idea, again, of the use of
callback functions or programs. Pretty neat!
Neat, yes. Callback? I don't see it. I think you have conflated the
repetitiveness with the callback concept.
Hmm... perhaps I misread you. Maybe you are saying that readdir()
indeed does NOT involve callbacks at all, and were specifically trying
to highlight the difference between Qp0lProcessSubtree() (which takes
a callback, and uses that callback in a loop) and readdir() (which
does not, and you have to do the loop yourself).

Sorry if my previous response misconstrued what you were trying to say.

John






Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2014 by MIDRANGE dot COM and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available here. If you have questions about this, please contact