As I wrote my reply, I was thinking about whether we can specify the
address of a procedure in another service program, say. I didn't bring
it up, because I wasn't sure, and I thought it'd confuse the issue.
Generalizing to that would have benefits similar to what we espouse
already for service programs.
I'll still go with the callback term - I could even say that the called
party is calling back to someone known to the calling party. It does
seem to get a bit precious, however, and the traditional understanding
works for me, although I hear what you are saying.
On 10/15/2012 5:33 PM, John Yeung wrote:
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Vernon Hamberg
The easiest example I use - the almost-only-one, actually, is when I useI have never really liked the explanation that the called function is
the qsort API - when you call qsort, you tell it what data is to be
sorted, how long each element is, and a pointer to a procedure that will
compare 2 elements and return either that they are the same or that one
or the other is larger. That procedure is the callback - maybe we can
think of it as a CALL BACK to the caller of qsort. qsort walks through
the elements and passes pairs of them to the callback procedure.
"calling back" to the original caller. Yes, that's where the term
came from, but I don't think it emphasizes the right things.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2015 by MIDRANGE dot COM and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available here. If you have questions about this, please contact