|
On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 9:54 AM B Stone <bvstone@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
You're talking 300 about second!
I think you meant "about" 300 per second. Whether that's impressive or not,
wouldn't that depend on the number of CPU cores the service was using? If
only 1 core then each transaction is consuming just 3.3 milliseconds on
average. But if 128 cores then each transaction would be consuming 427
milliseconds on average.
--
This is the Web Enabling the IBM i (AS/400 and iSeries) (WEB400) mailing
list
To post a message email: WEB400@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400
or email: WEB400-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at https://archive.midrange.com/web400.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.