|
In regard to my response being contradictory to whether QTEMP is unique or
not - so was your original premise about one job's QTEMP object getting
clobbered by another job.
To be blunt, I advise against using CGI for business applications, because
faulty program logic can destabilize the entire HTTP service. Similarity, I
advise against embedding an HTTP service within applications (i.e. Node.js).
I believe that HTTP should be used only for communications; that business
applications should run in separate processes; and that there should be
some way for both to communicate with each other. IBM i CGI kind of does
that - but not well enough IMHO. CGI Jobs are too tightly coupled with HTTP
server threads.
You seem to advise against it, yet isn't QTEMP a hallmark of IBMi jobs and
unique across jobs as we've been discussing ?
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.