Re: Question on QTEMP and CGI Jobs -- WEB400

Good News Everybody!

The new search engine is LIVE!

Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.

Subject: Re: Question on QTEMP and CGI Jobs
From: Richard Schoen <Richard.Schoen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2017 13:52:17 +0000
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/web400/>
List-help: <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: "Web Enabling the IBM i \(AS/400 and iSeries\)" <web400.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:web400@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

The app does use cookies to track a session ID.

This is for back end processing during the RPG/CGI call.

Regards,

Richard Schoen
Director of Document Management
e. richard.schoen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
p. 952.486.6802
w. helpsystems.com
------------------------------

message: 5
date: Sat, 4 Mar 2017 00:57:14 -0600
from: Booth Martin <booth@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
subject: Re: [WEB400] Question on QTEMP and CGI Jobs

Not an answer for you, but I am curious? Why this solution instead of a cookie on the client?

On 3/3/2017 11:57 PM, Richard Schoen wrote:

We have an interesting scenario where a CGI job is using a data area in QTEMP for a temp value in a web app and there appears to be a random issue where that value gets clobbered by another job. (At least that's what we think is happening.)

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.