×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
Good question - the DB2 engine on i for mySql was just that - a way to
store data defined in mySql in a different way. Postgresql is
self-contained, so far as I know. Does it have plugins for storage
engines that are similar to what mySql has? If not, there's no reason to
go with it. The mySql effort seems related to PHP, et al. The engine
made is possible to read mySql data in native programs. Again, no
similar purpose exists with any other RDBMS that I'm aware of.
Regards
Vern
On 12/18/2010 2:21 PM, Thorbjoern Ravn Andersen wrote:
-snip-
Why would you choose PostgreSQL instead of DB2/400 which works out of
the box?
/Thorbjørn
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
