× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.




The good thing about JavaFX - as I can see it - it is super clean syntax. If
you compare it with flex, you will have this ugly XML / javascript mixture.
The same goes for Silverlight - I just hate XAML.

Like one of my friends like to say "XAML and the sun - it the same - don't
look directly into it"


I have only been in love with javaFX for about an hour so ... Before I jump
on the bandwagon I'll have to dig a little deeper. But I'll keep you posted.

Thanx John e for totally mess up my Christmas !!

Over and out - see you guys in 2009

Happy holidays from Denmark

Best regards


Niels Liisberg
IceBreak Chief SW Architect

System & Metode Technologies
Håndværkersvinget 8, DK-2970 Hørsholm
Phone: +45 70 20 36 10
Fax: +45 70 20 30 11
Direct: +45 45 177 055
Mobile: +45 31 158 861
E-mail: nli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Web: www.system-method.com and www.Icebreak.org




-----Original Message-----
From: web400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:web400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Aaron Bartell
Sent: 23. december 2008 15:41
To: Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries
Subject: [WEB400] JavaFX viability was->Re: Pete's web5250

I just got done with my morning break on the throne and found a good
update article in SDTimes:


http://sdtimes.com/SUN_RELEASES_JAVAFX_1_0_FOR_WEB_DEVELOPMENT/About_JAVA_an
d_MACOS_and_NETBEANS_and_RIAS_and_WINDOWS_and_APPLE_and_MICROSOFT_and_SUN/33
093

I tried to load some JavaFX apps onto my machine (per John) only to find
out that the Linux desktop isn't yet supported - bummer.

If JavaFX is easier to code (i.e. simpler syntax) it makes me wonder if
it
will also be used on the server side to replace Java business logic and
the like? Competitor of EGL maybe?

Niels, if you research it more please do respond back and let us know
what
you find.

Aaron Bartell
http://mowyourlawn.com

Niels Liisberg wrote:

john e wrote: Maybe it's an idea to replace the bloated browser with a


java client, JavaFX to be precise<

Hi John.

I had never heard about JavaFX - but after browsing around, download it to
my NetBeans .. must say .. I'm in love :)

The language is a crossover between java and javascript. Fx is a dynamic
language where you access java classes and define object just like in
javascript. Very slick way of inherence and the way to expose methods as
properties with a simple "bind" keyword - is just brilliant.

JavaFX is actually another good argument for making the 5250 javascript
proxy - JavaFX will just swallow the JSON stream I am talking about....





Best regards


Niels Liisberg
IceBreak Chief SW Architect

System & Metode Technologies
Haandvaerkersvinget 8, DK-2970 Ho/rsholm
Phone: +45 70 20 36 10
Fax: +45 70 20 30 11
Direct: +45 45 177 055
Mobile: +45 31 158 861
E-mail: nli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Web: www.system-method.com and www.Icebreak.org


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.