|
> From: Brad Stone > > Sorry, I guess you weren't clear when you made your > statement. As for "inferior", we opinions are like... > *cough* :) Yeah, but my opinion is right <smile>. >From a purely objective standpoint: 1. JSP UI is compiled to machine code, whereas CGI code is template driven and must be at the very least be read from a pool each time. And unless you store all of your snippets in memory (which is one big pool), you'll have to read the stuff from disk. 2. The JSP portion can be moved off of the iSeries onto a $500 server box. This can offload that nasty ol' JVM from the iSeries if memory is your big concern, but even more importantly it can allow your user interface to be in the DMZ, totally separate from your production iSeries. 3. The JSP tag library is an industry standard, understood by a very large community of programmers. The CGI syntax you use (including the names of the procedures you call) depends on the variation of the CGI library you use. Those are the most glaring architectural deficiencies of the RPG-CGI approach. Joe
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.