|
Tom,
Even for a tech preview, it can easily be worth spending a fraction of a
developer's annual salary /if/ it actually makes a significant difference. Unfortunately, until we all see what it can do, it's guesswork. I think the point you are missing though is that those developers already have CODE Designer - in other words for many the productivity difference you use to justify the cost (which at $3,500 US is frankly ridiculous) has already been factored in and (perhaps) used to justify the cost of PC upgrades. If CODE Designer didn't exist I would be more inclined to agree with you. There is very little in the new Designer (other than integration) that CODE Designer doesn't already have. In fact since the new one does not (yet?) incorporate Print design it is a retrograde step. Jon Paris Partner400 www.Partner400.com
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
