RE: [SYS21] Vendor Scheduling Question...

One of our most frequent issues with VS is that schedule creation
ignores the effectivity dates on the contract lines.

I.e. if you put an ending effectivity on a part on a contract, and later
open a new line
for the part, the schedules will be created against the first line it finds
regardless of effectivity date.  This results in new PO lines being
generated
on the wrong/old PO number.

This was supposed to be fixed in v3.5.2b SP3 under PTF P#VSV30028



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeff_Klipa/Harvard@harvardind.com
> [SMTP:Jeff_Klipa/Harvard@harvardind.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 9:21 AM
> To:   jbausers-l@midrange.com
> Subject:      [SYS21]   Vendor Scheduling Question...
>
> We're at V3.5.1...
> I seem to recall there are some pitfalls to using Vendor Scheduling...
> One of which is that you should not amend any PO's created with VS because
> it
> does not update the contract...
> Is this the only reason and are there any other pitfalls on which anyone
> would
> like to elaborate...?
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the GEAC/JBA System 21 Users (JBAUSERS-L) mailing list
> To post a message email: JBAUSERS-L@midrange.com
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/jbausers-l
> or email: JBAUSERS-L-request@midrange.com
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/jbausers-l.
>
>
_________________________________________________________________
This electronic mail transmission contains confidential information intended
only for the person(s) and/or organization named. Any use, distribution,
copying or disclosure by or to any other person outside your organization is
strictly prohibited. If you received this transmission in error, please send
an electronic mail message to postmaster@pollak.com so we may instruct you
regarding its disposition.