RE: SYS21 - Routes & structures Header Effectivity Dates

[Dave Bean <beand@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Just went thru that issue with geac last month. We were using that field
for basically
reference purposes. The effectivity dates on the header were not supposed
to actually
be active. Upon our uplift to SP4, however, our schedule control items
stopped booking the top level item. The component items were posting,
however. This issue
went to the UK, where they confirmed that the header effectivity dates were
not
supposed to do anything. The reference dates that we had entered were
causing the
booking problem, tho. The solution was not to use the header fields. The UK
said they would look at those fields in the next service pack. There should
be an issue registered with geac on this. Answerlink seems to be down, now,
so I cant check.  Hope this helps.

Dave Bean
Chief Automotive Systems, Inc.

-----Original Message-----
From:   mslayton@ambrake.com [SMTP:mslayton@ambrake.com]
Sent:   Wednesday, August 21, 2002 1:55 PM
To:     jbausers-l@midrange.com
Subject:        SYS21 -  Routes & structures Header Effectivity Dates

This is a multipart message in MIME format.
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
Is anyone using the Effectivity Begin and End Dates on the route header
records?  If so, are you having any problems with transactions not posting
in inventory but posting in production.

_______________________________________________
This is the GEAC/JBA System 21 Users (JBAUSERS-L) mailing list
To post a message email: JBAUSERS-L@midrange.com
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/jbausers-l
or email: JBAUSERS-L-request@midrange.com
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/jbausers-l.