Re: JBA ML - Re: AFI : Purchase Management

I did some testing with PM AFI along time ago.
>From memory, the best thing to do is to ignore it and use Purrchase
matching and Inventory AFI.
With the Matching process everything is  handled by the resulting AP
Invoice - including the price variance.
The main concern with Purchase matching is to make sure your pricing
is correct, and the AP staff know which Price variance Account to use.

Regards

Michael


Original message from: DAhKow@ibl.intnet.mu
>
>
>Hi all,
>
>     we have always been been told by JBA support that AFI for
Purchase
>Management does not work. Does anyone know whether this statement is
true
>or otherwise has successfully set-up AFI for PM?
>We are currently on version 3.5.2b SP3. Up to now our AFI set-up  has
been
>interfacing all Purchase Receipts via the inventory movements
generated.
>
>Regards
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>This is the GEAC/JBA System 21 Users (JBAUSERS-L) mailing list
>To post a message email: JBAUSERS-L@midrange.com
>To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
>visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/jbausers-l
>or email: JBAUSERS-L-request@midrange.com
>Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
>at http://archive.midrange.com/jbausers-l.
>
>.
>


__________________________________________________________________
Get your free Australian email account at http://www.start.com.au