RE: Inventory Single step transfer (43/INP)

We use WH (if there is a way not to you ought consider them) and have
defined several areas and do transfers between them. Areas would be much
easier than transfers between warehouses. The reason I said to reconsider
using WH, while in itself its not a bad product, the levels of overhead to
do OE, PM or other applications is cumbersome to most users. WH adds several
more tasks to everyone's job. If your looking for just inventory tracking or
control take a look at the Stock Locator application just released with SP3
of 3.5.2B.
Good luck.

Mex Davis
MIS Manager
Bekum America Corp.
517-655-7177


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-jbausers-l@midrange.com
[mailto:owner-jbausers-l@midrange.com]On Behalf Of
GManoovaloo@ibl.intnet.mu
Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 3:04 AM
To: JBAUSERS-L@midrange.com
Subject: Inventory Single step transfer (43/INP)


We are planning to implement  WH for a customer who has 2 stores
(stockrooms) : Bulk & Main store.
Each store would be declared as a warehouse . Items will often be moved
from Bulk to Main .
The  43/INP option seems, at present, the best option to reflect such a
movement, but since we do not know  WH enough, we would like to know the
impact this transaction may have in warehouse management.
Thanks for your valuable input .

Regards
Gilbert


+---
| This is the JBA Software Users Mailing List!
| To submit a new message send your mail to JBAUSERS-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to JBAUSERS-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to JBAUSERS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner: doug333@aol.com.
+---

+---
| This is the JBA Software Users Mailing List!
| To submit a new message send your mail to JBAUSERS-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to JBAUSERS-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to JBAUSERS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner: doug333@aol.com.
+---