RE: Re: QSRV able to PWRDWNSYS?

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
You know, that's a good question.  At first, it seemed obvious to me
that they should have the authority, but now that I've had a chance to
think about it, I seem to recall that I had to power down for a CE
several years ago.

It's just a real pain when the system in question is hundreds of miles
away as it was yesterday (Sunday), and I have to drive in to sign on to
the system, PWRDWNSYS, and sign off.  Forty-five minutes wasted.  Oh
well, that's why I love this job, right?  <g>

Dan Bale
IT - AS/400
Handleman Company
248-362-4400  Ext. 4952
D.Bale@Handleman.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: neilp@dpslink.com [SMTP:neilp@dpslink.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 2:36 PM
> To:   security400@midrange.com
> Subject:      [Security400] Re: QSRV able to PWRDWNSYS?
>
> You've never had a CSR/CE/whatever take down a system without asking ?
> ;-)
> I think it's a good idea they don't have authority to PWRDWNSYS.
>
> Object . . . . . . . :   PWRDWNSYS       Owner  . . . . . . . :   QSYS
>   Library  . . . . . :     QSYS          Primary group  . . . :
> *NONE
> Object type  . . . . :   *CMD
>
> Object secured by authorization list  . . . . . . . . . . . . :
> *NONE
>
>                          Object
> User        Group       Authority
> QSYS                    *ALL
> QSYSOPR                 *USE
> *PUBLIC                 *EXCLUDE
>
>
> ...Neil
>