|
Am 02.01.2025 um 14:44 schrieb Justin Taylor:
Retrofitting a single program with a modern UI is one thing, but what about
thousands? I see that as the biggest hurdle. You've got teams with the
capacity to maintain and enhance the current program suite, but not enough
to refactor everything.
Am 02.01.2025 um 14:59 schrieb Brad Stone:
It's been 25 years plus since CGI programming has been a viable option.
And it still is. Even longer since ILE has been available to try to
encapsulate functions.
The other side of the coin is, to me at least, is that users used to the
"fast entry" of green screens wouldn't want a web update, but would
eventually use it after the initial shock.
I know a lot of the applications I use for business are all web based now. At first I hated it (and in some cases still do) but I grow to tolerate them.
Am 02.01.2025 um 15:47 schrieb Steve M:[snip]
To add to Craig's post - Transportation is the same way. The dispatching
systems have been on green screen for so long, any long-time dispatcher will
refuse to use a GUI.
Extremely resistant to any data entry changes.
Am 02.01.2025 um 15:58 schrieb Patrik Schindler:
Well, one could say, that is what one gets when one piles up technical debt over years. But it is also the natural (speak: monetary) way of things.
Thousands of applications haven't been written in a year, and likewise they can't be replaced by what is essentially a new application in a fraction of that time. And, TBH, there's nothing more frustrating than doing the Sisyphus thing for years to come. That's why I am a friend of not doing it "when there's time", but do it properly as a one-time project.[snip]
On the other hand, if *the* central application suite of a company must be — more or less — rewritten anyway, this might give way to discussions about getting rid of IBM i. From a boss/monetary point of view, this consideration appearing on the slate is somewhat natural.
For the record: I'm a keen proponent of TUI applications and my view is thus biased/spoiled.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.